The iPhone 16e’s lack of MagSafe doesn’t make sense
The iPhone 16e, Apple’s replacement for the iPhone SE, has plenty of features that make it a good deal, from its A18 chip to the fact that it actually comes with an OLED screen. But one glaring omission in its spec sheet makes no sense: Why doesn’t this $599 phone have MagSafe?
Despite looking a lot like an iPhone 14, and using components that are similar to the iPhone 16, the iPhone 16e doesn’t support MagSafe or fast wireless charging. Apple expects iPhone 16e owners to be happy with the same wireless charging speeds as an iPhone SE released in 2022, and the slight advantage of using a USB-C port rather than a Lighting port.
The iPhone 16e’s missing MagSafe feels particularly strange because the feature has been a given for years at this point. Apple introduced MagSafe to its smartphones with the iPhone 12 as a magnetic accessory and charging standard, and has included it in every phone since. MagSafe borrows the name of the magnetic connectors on Apple’s laptops, but with some key differences. MagSafe on an iPhone means you have strong built-in magnets that let your phone attaches to cases, mounts, wallets and stands, without any extra fiddly pieces. When you charge over MagSafe, you also get faster charging speeds, bumping things from 7.5W charging to up to 25W charging with the right charging brick.
More importantly, using magnets to directly guide a charger to charging coils largely eliminates the possibility of a phone being on a charger but not actually getting charged. It’s likely one of the main reasons why MagSafe was adopted into the wider Qi2 wireless charging standard — it just makes the whole thing a lot more convenient.
That doesn’t really explain why Apple would leave it out of the iPhone 16e, though. The company’s definition of what makes a “Pro” feature is always in flux, and it will often will leave features or components out to justify a lower price. But Apple and its partners likely sell a lot of MagSafe accessories, doesn’t Apple want to sell those to iPhone 16e owners, too?
The interesting wrinkle in all of this is Qi2, which has been available for phone makers to use since 2023, but hasn’t seen widespread adoption outside of Apple’s phones. Samsung, a company that should have more than enough money to work Qi2 into its flagships, instead offers a case you can buy if you want to use Qi2 charging on the Galaxy S25. Other Android makers are no better: you won’t find Qi2 on the Pixel 9, Motorola Razr+ or Galaxy Z Flip and Fold 6. It’s possible Qi2 or MagSafe is more expensive (or difficult) to include than it appears, and Apple has been “generous” all this time. That might make the decision to not support the standard make more sense. But that doesn’t change the fact that the iPhone 16e’s lack of MagSafe is very annoying.
This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/mobile/smartphones/the-iphone-16es-lack-of-magsafe-doesnt-make-sense-202101406.html?src=rss
The iPhone 16e, Apple’s replacement for the iPhone SE, has plenty of features that make it a good deal, from its A18 chip to the fact that it actually comes with an OLED screen. But one glaring omission in its spec sheet makes no sense: Why doesn’t this $599 phone…
