Google foreshadows its final arguments in search monopoly trial
Google has offered a glimpse into its final arguments to a DC federal judge as it seeks to convince the court it’s not operating an unlawful monopoly in search.
The company filed an unsealed version of its posttrial brief on Friday in its battle against the US Department of Justice over its search distribution agreements. The DOJ has argued that Google used exclusionary contracts with phone manufacturers and web browser operators to make it harder for other search engines to compete. It’s expected to file its own brief by the end of the day as well.
In the brief filed Friday, Google said that evidence from the trial shows “conclusively” that “Google is the highest quality, most popular search engine in the United States, with the highest general search engine advertising monetization. The evidence additionally established that the partners who choose to contract with Google to preload Google Search as the default search engine overwhelmingly prefer Google to any other search engine.”
Witnesses at the trial included executives that run Google Search competitors, like Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and DuckDuckGo CEO Gabriel Weinberg. They described how Google’s alleged cornering of the market prevented them from gaining the necessary search volume that could help them become more robust alternatives.
Google says that the DOJ and collection of states that sued it want to “have Google punished and uniquely handicapped from competing to win these revenue share agreements.” The result, Google argues, would be giving lower-quality search engines a leg up with the hope they will rise to the challenge, “despite a long track record of failing to achieve such success in the past, even after they won search defaults or otherwise acquired search query scale through agreements with other search engines like the 2009 Microsoft-Yahoo agreement.”
“That result is antithetical to U.S. antitrust law,” Google continues. “Punishing a successful firm that has out-innovated its competitors to the benefit of consumers harms competition, not the other way around.”
The DOJ and states that have challenged Google also have until the end of the day to file public versions of posttrial materials, based on the court’s instructions. Closing arguments in the case are expected in May, following a multi-week trial that wrapped up at the end of 2023.
Google has offered a glimpse into its final arguments to a DC federal judge as it seeks to convince the court it’s not operating an unlawful monopoly in search. The company filed an unsealed version of its posttrial brief on Friday in its battle against the US Department of Justice…
Recent Posts
- X-Men ‘97 didn’t have to go that hard
- This smart smoker makes barbecuing indoors a breeze
- Sugar’s big twist was more than a gimmick
- Logitech Casa Pop-Up Desk Review: A Cute Portable Workstation
- Scientists have created an ultra resistant storage solution that can resist temperatures of 1100°F — shame that it will only be available in megabyte capacities for a foreseeable future
Archives
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- December 2011