AI can’t patent inventions, only humans, US Patent Office says
The US Patent Office (USPTO) has said that AI cannot be listed as the owner of a patent, even if the AI did all the hard work.
The owner of the patent must always be human, although that human must have “significantly contributed” to the invention itself, the USPTO said in a new document entered to the federal register.
Therefore, if you own an AI that independently spits out a patentable design, you cannot claim ownership simply because you invented the AI.
What exactly is human?
The document, titled “Inventorship Guidance for AI-assisted Inventions”, provides clarification that while AI-assisted innovation is becoming more common, the patenting process should primarily be attributed to humans as it is humans who are incentivised and rewarded for submitting a patent.
Included in the document is an important disclaimer pointing out that this guidance “does not have the force and effect of law.” The document instead provides an interpretation of how AI-assisted patents could be submitted in the future with regard to recent decisions made by the Supreme Court and Federal Circuit.
At least one human must be named as the inventor of the patent, and that human can only claim credit for an AI-assisted invention if the human “takes the output of an AI system and makes a significant contribution to the output to create an invention.”
Therefore, simply giving an AI a goal or asking an AI to solve a problem does not count as “significant contribution,” nor does recognizing the potential usefulness of an AI-produced output “particularly when the properties and utility of the output are apparent to those of ordinary skill.”
The document draws on the AI executive order set forth by the Biden Administration in October 2023 that recognizes how responsible AI will boost innovation, competition and collaboration for businesses of all sizes.
This guidance is therefore not an attempt to limit the use of AI, but instead seeks to provide an interpretation of how responsible AI-assisted innovation should be regulated and rewarded.
Via TechCrunch
More from TechRadar Pro
The US Patent Office (USPTO) has said that AI cannot be listed as the owner of a patent, even if the AI did all the hard work. The owner of the patent must always be human, although that human must have “significantly contributed” to the invention itself, the USPTO said…
Recent Posts
- Maximizing cybersecurity ROI: A strategic approach
- Instagram’s co-founder is Anthropic’s new chief product officer
- Apple brings eye-tracking to recent iPhones and iPads
- Netflix movie of the day: Jack Black is back for more martial arts madness in Kung Fu Panda 3
- Social media users are blocking celebs to support Palestine
Archives
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- December 2011