This iPhone 17 Pro camera rumor is making me hesitate about getting a 16 Pro –here’s why

The iPhone 16 Pro is barely a month old, but we’re already seeing some credible rumors for next year’s successor – and the latest camera speculation for the iPhone 17 Pro has got me considering delaying my iPhone upgrade.
According to a research note from the usually reliable analyst Jeff Pu (via MacRumors), both the iPhone 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max will see their 5x telephoto camera upgraded from a 12MP sensor to a 48MP one. Less excitingly (for me, at least), the front camera will also be boosted to a 24MP sensor.
The note contains other predictions for Apple‘s next flagship phone – both models will apparently get 12GB RAM (up from 8GB) to improve Apple Intelligence and multitasking speeds, plus a first major reduction in size for the Dynamic Island (thanks to a new metalens for the Face ID system). Naturally, there will also be a new A19 Pro chip.
But as a photographer who’s close to upgrading to the iPhone 16 Pro, those telephoto rumors for the 17 Pro have given me pause for thought. I’ve previously written about why I skipped the iPhone 15 Pro, with the main reason being my golden rule to wait until any new Apple feature reaches second-generation refinement.
This year, the iPhone 16 Pro brought Apple’s 5x telephoto camera to the smaller Pro model (it was previously a Max exclusive), but it is largely identical to last year with an f/2.8 aperture and 12MP sensor. That ‘zoom’ camera will reach real maturity, it seems, in the 17 Pro series with the same 48MP boost that Apple brought to the iPhone Pro’s wide-angle camera this year – and that could be worth waiting for.
Why a telephoto upgrade would be a big deal
Apple left one of the iPhone 16 Pro’s three cameras with a 12MP resolution – the telephoto one. The main camera is a 24mm, 48MP affair with a bright f/1.78 aperture, while the 13mm Ultra Wide was upgraded to 48MP. While the Ultra Wide doesn’t pack the same computational ‘Fusion’ magic as the main camera, the resolution is still a helpful upgrade for things like macro shots.
Sensor size is at least as important as resolution, if not more so. But a higher-resolution 48MP sensor can help reduce noise through ‘binning’ – in other words, combining adjacent pixels to make larger ones that are more sensitive to light. Technical improvements like that are particularly helpful when light is being bounced around an internal tetraprism, like it is on the telephoto lens.
Sign up for breaking news, reviews, opinion, top tech deals, and more.
If the iPhone 17 Pro’s telephoto camera combined a resolution boost with a larger sensor, its image quality would be much-improved. While our iPhone 16 Pro review found its 5x camera to be perfectly solid, it is still the weakest sibling of the phone’s three hardware-based cameras – and one I’d probably only use in emergencies or as a handy pair of digital binoculars.
Of course, waiting for Apple to give the iPhone Pro series a ‘perfect’ photography setup – three 48MP cameras with large sensors and ‘Fusion’ processing – is a fool’s game. Apple is a master of bread-crumbing these little camera upgrades just enough to keep you on the upgrade cycle. I will most likely still succumb to the temptation of an iPhone 16 Pro upgrade, but these rumors mean it’s certainly tempting to wait one more year.
You might also like…
The iPhone 16 Pro is barely a month old, but we’re already seeing some credible rumors for next year’s successor – and the latest camera speculation for the iPhone 17 Pro has got me considering delaying my iPhone upgrade. According to a research note from the usually reliable analyst Jeff…
Recent Posts
- There’s Nothing left to hide as leaked videos reveal the Phone 3A in full
- North Korean hackers are posing as software development recruiters to target freelancers
- The Morning After: Apple reveals its new cheapest iPhone. What’s missing?
- HP is apparently forcing customer support callers to wait 15 minutes before talking to anyone
- IBM return-to-office scheme is reportedly targeting older workers
Archives
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- September 2018
- October 2017
- December 2011
- August 2010