NASA is apparently seriously lacking when it comes to data security


The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is pretty good at keeping Classified information away from falling into the wrong hands, but it’s not that good at labeling all of the right data as Classified.
This becomes a major problem because it puts many projects and information in jeopardy from insider attacks, says the latest report on the organization’s state of cybersecurity, published by the NASA Office of Inspector General.
The “NASA’s insider threat program” report reveals that the “vast majority” of NASA technology is not labeled as Classified, including “high-value assets and critical infrastructure.” Some of these assets include “sensitive and valuable information such as scientific, engineering, or research data; human resources files; or procurement sensitive information.”
Labeling classified data
As these items are not labeled as Classified, they aren’t covered by the various defenses the organization deployed for its insider protection program.
Things wouldn’t be that bad if unclassified, but sensitive information, wasn’t abused every day. The auditor says in its report that the number of incidents, including the improper use of the organization’s IT systems, rose 343% in three years (from 249 in 2017, to 1,103 in 2020).
Of all these incidents, the most common problem was “failing to protect Sensitive but Unclassified (SBU) information”. Apparently, many NASA employees were sending each other unencrypted emails containing SBU data, Personally Identifiable Information (PII), or International Traffic in Arms Regulations data.
Another potential problem is frequent privilege elevation for the employees. In the last three years, NASA users made more than 12,000 requests for privilege elevation.
To better protect its data, the watchdog hints, NASA needs to reorganize informational security responsibilities. As things stand now, multiple teams are in charge of securing the organization’s endpoints, including the Office of Protective Services (OPS), and the Office of the Chief Information Officer (OCIO).
Via: The Register
Audio player loading… The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is pretty good at keeping Classified information away from falling into the wrong hands, but it’s not that good at labeling all of the right data as Classified. This becomes a major problem because it puts many projects and information…
Recent Posts
- Rivian’s new Dune edition lets you channel your inner Fremen
- Here’s when and where you can preorder the new iPhone 16E
- The Humane AI Pin debacle is a reminder that AI alone doesn’t make a compelling product
- This 1.9-pound smartphone’s massive battery offers six months of standby
- Movie sales – including 4K Blu-ray – fell again last year, but if you’re going streaming only, you’re massively missing out
Archives
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- September 2018
- October 2017
- December 2011
- August 2010