Some employers won’t like this: the most productive staff are working shorter sprints and taking longer breaks
- The most productive people now rest for nearly two and a half hours in an eight-hour day, report claims
- In-office work may naturally support better mental recovery
- DeskTime’s productivity metric is role-specific, which brings in subjectivity
The long-held belief that working longer hours leads to higher productivity is facing increasing scrutiny, after new research claimed quite the opposite.
A new study by DeskTime challenges this conventional wisdom, revealing shorter work sessions combined with longer breaks may correlate with higher levels of output.
The study found the most productive employees now follow a 75/33 work-to-rest ratio, working for 75 minutes followed by a 33-minute break. This represents a significant increase in rest time compared to DeskTime’s original 52/17 ratio reported a decade ago.
Productivity is subjective, not universal
This means that in an 8-hour workday, current-day productive employees will need about two hours and twenty-seven minutes (147 minutes) of rest.
The rest time is higher than the 118 minutes given to productive employees for the same workday ten years ago.
This revelation may not sit well with employers who equate productivity with endurance rather than efficiency. However, the shift to a 75/33 cycle in 2025 may reflect how hybrid or in-office work fosters more balanced work habits.
“When DeskTime conducted the work/break ratio study back in 2021, we saw that working from home had immensely impacted workers’ ability to draw a line between work and life,” said Artis Rozentals, CEO of DeskTime.
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
“Now, our latest productivity research shows we’re returning to more balanced working habits. Given the prevalence of hybrid work, the new 75/33 ratio may be linked to working in-office again.”
Indeed, in-office work naturally introduces more breaks through informal interactions and social moments. These may appear counterproductive on the surface, but could be essential for mental rejuvenation.
“The hybrid model is the Goldilocks choice, as it best leverages both the in-office social dynamic and the deep focus afforded by remote work,” Rozentals added.
As a result, companies using employee monitoring software may need to reconsider how they define “productive behavior.”
To identify top performers, DeskTime analyzed the top 10% of users with the highest ratio of time spent in productive applications. This group – comprising 6,000 individuals – served as the benchmark for the study’s findings.
Unlike many metrics that rely on generalized definitions, DeskTime’s approach to productivity is more tailored. The software allows users to define which applications are considered productive based on their specific roles.
However, since the data is based on software-tracked activity, it raises questions about the nuances such tools may overlook.
Platforms that offer quantitative insights, like task management platforms, often fail to capture the full picture, especially when so-called “idle” time includes thinking, strategizing, or informal collaboration.
You might also like
The most productive people now rest for nearly two and a half hours in an eight-hour day, report claims In-office work may naturally support better mental recovery DeskTime’s productivity metric is role-specific, which brings in subjectivity The long-held belief that working longer hours leads to higher productivity is facing increasing…
Recent Posts
- Google Wallet ID passes will be available in select EU states this summer
- Shokz upgraded its open earbuds with better sound and a lighter design
- Shokz says its clip-on OpenDots 2 earbuds focus on improved volume and bass
- How to watch England vs New Zealand: TV Channels, Full Schedule & 1st Test Preview
- Nomad Goods Promo Codes: Get 25% Off in June 2026
Archives
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023