US plans to support controversial cybercrime UN treaty despite fears it could be misused
- The latest draft of the UN Cybercrime Convention faces key vote
- The US is set to support the treaty
- Human rights advocates say the convention will make it easier for authoritarian regimes to expand surveillance
A new draft of the UN Cybercrime Convention is set to face a key vote, and the Biden administration is reportedly set to support the treaty, despite criticism from digital rights organizations and human rights campaigners.
The convention is the first piece of legally binding legislation from the UN regarding cybersecurity, and its supporters hope to use it to establish a global framework for states to use to investigate and prevent cybercrime.
However, not only does Cisco think the treaty falls short of sufficiently protecting basic human rights, but some campaigners have said this convention will actually make it easier for authoritarian regimes to abuse their power and expand policing and surveillance.
Extensive deliberation
US officials confirmed there had been consultations with allied states and reviewed hundreds of written submissions from non-government organizations, and ultimately ‘decided to remain with consensus’.
A contributing factor to the support from the US was the need to influence later amendments and updates to the treaty, which would be made easier by support from the early stages.
A group of Democratic senators recently wrote the treaty could “legitimize efforts by authoritarian countries” to censor and surveil internet users and political activists.
“While the executive branch’s efforts to steer this treaty in a less-harmful direction are commendable, more must be done to keep the convention from being used to justify such actions,” the senators said in a joint letter to the Secretary of State, Attorney General, and others.
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
A primary concern for digital rights groups is that the treaty doesn’t focus on crimes committed against computer systems, such as ransomware. Instead, the legislation focuses on digital communication systems, and could be used as an extension of police surveillance powers rather than protecting internet users and companies from cybercrime.
Via Politico
You might also like
The latest draft of the UN Cybercrime Convention faces key vote The US is set to support the treaty Human rights advocates say the convention will make it easier for authoritarian regimes to expand surveillance A new draft of the UN Cybercrime Convention is set to face a key vote,…
Recent Posts
- Here comes new Siri again
- ICYMI: the week’s 7 biggest tech stories, from Sony’s State of Play to Nvidia’s game-changing chip
- The Best 3-in-1 Apple Charging Stations After Testing Top Models
- ‘It’s becoming more difficult finding stable VPNs’ – China increases crackdown on VPN usage
- Google will pay SpaceX $920 million a month to use xAI’s data centers
Archives
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023