Ford promises not to sell your driving habits to data brokers
Ford vowed to never sell customer driving data to third-party data brokers as part of a new privacy promise aimed at setting the automaker apart from competitors that have faced legal and regulatory blowback for sharing telematics with data brokers without authorization.
As part of its new promise, Ford says it will strive to protect customer data by using aggregating and anonymizing techniques. It will also “provide clear and easy-to-understand information about how we use your personal information.” And while Ford says it will still use data to improve safety, it will allow customers to adjust how much or how little data they would prefer to share.
In making an explicit pledge not to sell customer data to outside firms, Ford is trying to position itself as one of the better actors in an industry rife with shady practices. “We know that trust is earned,” Kristin Jones, chief privacy officer at Ford, writes in a blog post. “Protecting your personal information is one way we intend to earn it every day.”
“We know that trust is earned.”
— Kristin Jones, Ford’s chief privacy officer
The promise comes in the wake of General Motors agreeing to pay $220 million to settle claims that it illegally sold driver and location information to data brokers. The agreement requires GM to limit the driving data it collects and obtain “express consent” from drivers before collecting their information.
Other automakers have been caught with their hands in the customer data cookie jar. A recent examination of 21 vehicle brands found that every single one transmitted data to at least one third-party domain over Wi-Fi. Over half contacted domains that specialize in advertising, tracking, or analytics (ATA), like Adobe, LexisNexis, and Amplitude, which gather details about your vehicle or driving behavior to sell to insurance companies or target you with ads.
In a recent report, Mozilla crowned modern connected cars “the worst category of products for privacy” ever reviewed. The global nonprofit found that 92 percent of the reviewed automakers provide drivers with little (if any) control over their personal data, with 84 percent sharing user data with outside parties.
Ford said it surveyed over 1,000 US customers, both Ford and non-Ford owners, who agreed that privacy is a top concern while over half of the respondents said they understand that some data sharing is okay. Forty-one percent said they were extremely or very concerned about data privacy in the auto industry, which was less than other groups like social media companies, the government, and financial institutions.
To be sure, Ford’s promise isn’t just words on a screen. In the US, the Federal Trade Commission stops companies from misleading the public through deceptive claims. If Ford publicly promises something like, “We never sell your driving data to brokers” but breaks that promise, the FTC and state attorneys general can step in. They can sue Ford, force the company to sign legally binding agreements to correct the issue, and impose substantial financial fines.
It should be noted that a company’s blog post or public promise is not a legal contract. The actual rules that apply to you are found in Ford’s official privacy policy and connected vehicle terms. Those legal agreements contain standard exceptions that allow Ford to share your data, such as complying with police requests or working with outside service providers. Also, opting out of data sharing does come with tradeoffs. While Ford states that data collection depends on the features you want to use, turning off vehicle tracking or location sharing often disables key features like built-in navigation, remote start, and wireless software updates.
Ford vowed to never sell customer driving data to third-party data brokers as part of a new privacy promise aimed at setting the automaker apart from competitors that have faced legal and regulatory blowback for sharing telematics with data brokers without authorization. As part of its new promise, Ford says…
Recent Posts
- Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War 4 creative director says King Art borrowed elements from Dawn of War 2 and 3 for heroes, ‘upgrade mechanics,’ and UI aspects, because while it loves the first game, ‘it’s also over 20 years old’
- When AI finds the path you didn’t know existed
- Rivian spinoff Also wants to reinvent the wheel — but first, it has to ship
- Apple AirPods 5 Review: Better Than Before but Not Quite Pro
- Redmagic upgrades its liquid-cooled gaming phone with extra RGBs
Archives
- November 2026
- October 2026
- September 2026
- August 2026
- July 2026
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023