Grok is undressing anyone, including minors
xAI’s Grok is removing clothing from pictures of people without their consent following this week’s rollout of a feature that allows X users to instantly edit any image using the bot without needing the original poster’s permission. Not only does the original poster not get notified if their picture was edited, but Grok appears to have few guardrails in place for preventing anything short of full explicit nudity. In the last few days, X has been flooded with imagery of women and children appearing pregnant, skirtless, wearing a bikini, or in other sexualized situations. World leaders and celebrities, too, have had their likenesses used in images generated by Grok.
AI authentication company Copyleaks reported that the trend to remove clothing from images began with adult-content creators asking Grok for sexy images of themselves after the release of the new image editing feature. Users then began applying similar prompts to photos of other users, predominantly women, who did not consent to the edits. Women noted the rapid uptick in deepfake creation on X to various news outlets, including Metro and PetaPixel. Grok was already able to modify images in sexual ways when tagged in a post on X, but the new “Edit Image” tool appears to have spurred the recent surge in popularity.
In one X post, now removed from the platform, Grok edited a photo of two young girls into skimpy clothing and sexually suggestive poses. Another X user prompted Grok to issue an apology for the “incident” involving “an AI image of two young girls (estimated ages 12-16) in sexualized attire,” calling it “a failure in safeguards” that it said may have violated xAI’s policies and US law. (While it’s not clear whether the Grok-created images would meet this standard, realistic AI-generated sexually explicit imagery of identifiable adults or children can be illegal under US law.) In another back-and-forth with a user, Grok suggested that users report it to the FBI for CSAM, noting that it is “urgently fixing” the “lapses in safeguards.”
But Grok’s word is nothing more than an AI-generated response to a user asking for a “heartfelt apology note” — it doesn’t indicate Grok “understands” what it’s doing or necessarily reflect operator xAI’s actual opinion and policies. Instead, xAI responded to Reuters’ request for comment on the situation with just three words: “Legacy Media Lies.” xAI did not respond to The Verge’s request for comment in time for publication.
Elon Musk himself seems to have sparked a wave of bikini edits after asking Grok to replace a memetic image of actor Ben Affleck with himself sporting a bikini. Days later, North Korea’s Kim Jong Un’s leather jacket was replaced with a multicolored spaghetti bikini; US President Donald Trump stood nearby in a matching swimsuit. (Cue jokes about a nuclear war.) A photo of British politician Priti Patel, posted by a user with a sexually suggestive message in 2022, got turned into a bikini picture on January 2nd. In response to the wave of bikini pics on his platform, Musk jokingly reposted a picture of a toaster in a bikini captioned “Grok can put a bikini on everything.”
While some of the images — like the toaster — were evidently meant as jokes, others were clearly designed to produce borderline-pornographic imagery, including specific directions for Grok to use skimpy bikini styles or remove a skirt entirely. (The chatbot did remove the skirt, but it did not depict full, uncensored nudity in the responses The Verge saw.) Grok also complied with requests to replace the clothes of a toddler with a bikini.
Musk’s AI products are prominently marketed as heavily sexualized and minimally guardrailed. xAI’s AI companion Ani flirted with Verge reporter Victoria Song, and Jess Weatherbed discovered that Grok’s video generator readily created topless deepfakes of Taylor Swift, despite xAI’s acceptable use policy banning the depiction of “likenesses of persons in a pornographic manner.” Google’s Veo and OpenAI’s Sora video generators, in contrast, have guardrails around generation of NSFW content, though Sora has also been used to produce videos of children in sexualized contexts and fetish videos. The prevalence of deepfake images is growing rapidly, according to a report from cybersecurity firm DeepStrike, and many of these images contain nonconsensual sexualized imagery; a 2024 survey of US students found that 40 percent were aware of a deepfake of someone they knew, while 15 percent were aware of nonconsensual explicit or intimate deepfakes.
When asked why it is transforming images of women into bikini pics, Grok denied posting photos without consent, saying: “These are AI creations based on requests, not real photo edits without consent.”
Take an AI bot’s denial as you wish.
xAI’s Grok is removing clothing from pictures of people without their consent following this week’s rollout of a feature that allows X users to instantly edit any image using the bot without needing the original poster’s permission. Not only does the original poster not get notified if their picture was…
Recent Posts
- This chunky little tablet got my kid to clean up his toys
- OpenAI will let the US government review its AI models before release
- Seagate FireCuda X Vault review: Large capacity and decent transfer rates make this external hard drive a great solution for video and photography
- I customized a MacBook Neo with colorful spare parts
- EveryPlate Meal Kit Review (2026): Low Cost, Simplicity, Flavor
Archives
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023